Agnosticism a very short introduction le poidevin robin. 1. What is agnosticism? 2019-03-16

Agnosticism a very short introduction le poidevin robin Rating: 8,3/10 785 reviews

Buy Very Short Introductions: Agnosticism by Robin Le Poidevin (2010, Paperback) online

agnosticism a very short introduction le poidevin robin

They at least had the courage of their misguided convictions. Our expert authors combine facts, analysis, perspective, new ideas, and enthusiasm to make interesting and challenging topics highly readable. These are just some of the questions that Robin Le Poidevin considers in this Very Short Introduction. These are just some of the questions that Robin Le Poidevin considers in this Very Short Introduction. These are just some of the questions that Robin Le Poidevin considers in this Very Short Introduction, as he sets the philosophical case for agnosticism and explores it as a historical and cultural phenomenon. Is it just the 'don't know' position on God, or is there more to it than this? What emerges is a much more sophisticated, and much more interesting, attitude than a simplefailure to either commit to, or reject, religious belief. Do you agree with him? Agnosticism: A Very Short Introduction asks if there is more to agnosticism than merely the absence of belief.

Next

Buy Very Short Introductions: Agnosticism by Robin Le Poidevin (2010, Paperback) online

agnosticism a very short introduction le poidevin robin

Le Poidevin challenges the common wisdom about agnosticism among both believers and atheists, and invites the reader to rethink their own position on the issues. A name provides a focus for thought and feeling. They are written by experts, and have been published In more than 25languages worldwide. Since this passage occurs at the beginning of a section entitled 'The Poverty of Agnosticism', it is evident that Dawkins is somewhat sympathetic to such attitudes. The evoked feelings may be hostile.

Next

Agnosticism: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions)

agnosticism a very short introduction le poidevin robin

Although there is some history in it, for which I am much indebted to Bernard Lightman's illuminating book The Origins ofAgnost:icism, what I present here views agnosticism from a philosophical angle. Asked whether he thought agnosticism was superior to atheism, he replied that there was no difference between them. He sets the philosophical case for agnosticism and explores it as a historical and cultural phenomenon. The key question is whether or not agnosticism is justified, whether or not it is the right attitude to take towards that most urgent of issues, the existence of God. They were, it was suggested, just atheists under a different name.

Next

Agnosticism: A Very Short Introduction by Robin Le Poidevin (1970) Pdf Book ePub

agnosticism a very short introduction le poidevin robin

Who were the first to call themselves 'agnostics'? These are just some of the questions that Robin Le Poidevin considers in this Very Short Introduction. It is a feature of philosophical writing that positions are often presented, only then to be criticized and opposed, and that can be a little disconcerting to readers not already familiar with this style: just what position, they may wonder, is the author taking? Is it the result of too little thought about an issue--or too much? What place should agnosticism have in education? What emerges is a much more sophisticated, and much more interesting, attitude than a simple failure to either commit to, or reject, religious belief. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any fomt or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. It is not confined to the religious sphere. Can an agnostic live a religious life? Agnosticism emerges here as a much more sophisticated, and much more interesting, attitude than a simple failure to either commit to, or reject, religious belief. Who were the first to call themselves 'agnostics'? But Ingersoll's mission was not to promote agnosticism so much as emancipation from religion. Who were the first to call themselves 'agnostics'? Can an agnostic live a religious life? Is it a belief, or merely the absence of belief? The series began in 1995, and now represents a wide variety of topics in history, philosophy, religion, science, and the humanities.

Next

1. What is agnosticism?

agnosticism a very short introduction le poidevin robin

Is it just the 'don't know' position on God, or is there more to it than this? But as a name, 'agnosticism' has been around for fewer than 150 years. Le Poidevin challenges the common wisdom about agnosticism among both believers and atheists, and invites the reader to rethink their own position on the issues. These are just some of the questions that Robin Le Poidevin considers in this Very Short Introduction. Does agnosticism deserve serious consideration today? No doubt something is different: a new ingredient, a new shape, a new orientation, a new ideological focus, a new generation of dynamic young leaders, and so on. Our expert authors combine facts, analysis, perspective, new ideas, and enthusiasm to make interesting and challenging topics highly readable.

Next

Buy Very Short Introductions: Agnosticism by Robin Le Poidevin (2010, Paperback) online

agnosticism a very short introduction le poidevin robin

Our expert authors combine facts, analysis, perspective, new ideas, and enthusiasm to make interesting and challenging topics highly readable. Le Poidevin challenges some preconceptions and assumptions among both believers and non-atheists, and invites the reader to rethinktheir own position on the issues. What place should agnosticism have in education? He sets the philosophical case for agnosticism and explores it as a historical and cultural phenomenon. This particular branding had every effect that could have been desired: it became a focus of interest, of debate. Is it a belief, or merely the absence of belief? It might, for instance, be the focus of a sociological survey of contemporary religious attitudes.

Next

Agnosticism: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions)

agnosticism a very short introduction le poidevin robin

Indeed, in arguing in favor of agnosticism as a respectable position to take, this stimulating and provocative guide takes issue on many points with the assertions of prominent atheists such as Richard Dawkins. Look, for instance, at the attitudes Richard Dawkins reports in The God Delusion: The robust Muscular Christian haranguing us from the pulpit of my old school chapel admitted a sneaking regard for atheists. Annual, 1897 3 The Bodleian Library, Uniwrsity of Oxford Per. Is it just the 'don't know' position on God, or is there more to it than this? These pocket-sized books are the perfect way to get ahead in a new subject quickly. But often, just the coining of a name itselfhas the power to change attitudes. It is a topic that invites exploration from a variety of angles.

Next

Agnosticism: A Very Short Introduction

agnosticism a very short introduction le poidevin robin

These pocket-sized books are the perfect way to get ahead in a new subject quickly. These are just some of the questions that Robin Le Poidevin considers in this Very Short Introduction, as he sets the philosophical case for agnosticism and explores it as a historical and cultural phenomenon. A common view is that it is nothing more than ticking the 'don't know' box on the question of God's existence. Is it appropriate to talk of right and wrong here? Worth noting: any belief, including theism, can and usually is on the spectrum of agnosticism. Le Poidevin challenges some preconceptions and assumptions among both believers and non-atheists, and invites the reader to rethink their own position on the issues. In 2007 he gave the Stanton Lectures in the Philosophy of Religion at Cambridge. Who were the first to call themselves 'agnostics'? So, in case there is any doubt, what is offered here is a defence of agnosticism, of a fairly strong kind.

Next